Hum, interesting verification of my musings lately that I need to get away from relying heavily on language and related analytical processes to communicate and receive clairsentient information.
It’s been an issue from the get go that techniques like automatic writing get info in a second… and then take another hour to write down during which some is already lost through forgetting. it’s inefficient and wasteful. I need to to be able to remember this stuff without translating it into the rather inadequate medium of written English. Similarly dreams are lost to memory unless written. So are much of journeys taken with or without THC assistance.
And then I read in Daz Smith’s 8 Martini’s magazine issue 18 (magazine is free to read):
… “Permit ourselves”?
I knew all this, but, I have never really considered that this is another skill, thinking and recalling accurately without sorting storage through the analytical mind.
the essay is focused on a specific issue but I want to expand thus to clairsentience in general. It directly impacts my knowledge seeking. I’m currently getting information from past lives, entities and my subconscious that I know I am missing, I can get details of the human lives and the non-human ones when not Erath based are limited and there are blanks where I know there’s something there and I just can’t see it or hear it.
Ingo Swann referred to this lack of skill as being not altogether natural, and in fact “psychic castration” (by ETs, as that’s more what this article is about: why can’t we psychically get more into on and communicate with the telepathic ETs better) - and that’s a large focus for occultists working with non human entities as well.
The “door” in the essay seems to be about many humans working together to build a pool of data where the verified UPG can be kept and unverified UPG excluded until it’s verified.
Most of us in the occult tend to work alone more, maybe pooling resources is ideal but in the interim always having to interpret the subconscious messages through language and what we know seems to be a limiting factor.
If my conscious mind can see and learn and invent new things in the physical, why can’t I learn completely new things through the subconscious too? Why is this interpretation always one way? I don’t feel like this is unique to the conscious mind, so is this the crux of the “psychic castration”, that you cannot interpret what you cannot imagine? Which implies it’s not a feature of having a wetware animal brain interface with my incarnate spirit.
So I want to find a way to communicate and learn clearly, psychic information that my conscious human mind has never seen or heard of. Not “it’s like this” or “feels like that” but learn the original new thing and as necessary develop non-human senses to interface with it, not vision or hearing or proprioception etc., but different ones, one’s I can’t imagine. A baby has to do it, so it’s possible, maybe oob.