No I hear what you are saying, but what I said is 100% in alignment with my personal values. Hear me out:
Historically, every time we depopulate half the bloody planet it gives an opportunity to start again. We are packed right now, our economies are failing, and the grip of the psychopathic control grid has never been tighter and so insidious. Our population just keeps getting larger and the scope of our personal freedoms, worldwide, is growing smaller. Nothing is going to change under these conditions. Call me a nay-sayer and a negative ninny, but I believe what I see shoved right in my face and I am an apt student of history. Every time in history a similar situation has rose the solution has invariably involved the death and suffering of the masses on large scales.
I know. Take an example like WW1. It was nothing more than a depopulation exercise to reduce the chances of the leaders losing power after they saw what happened in Russia. It scared them, so they effectively reduced the population demographic that could actually pose a threat to them. Well, they walked right into that one. If mankind once again finds itself in the same situation yet again and chooses to point the weapons at each other instead of the elite once again, then I have no pity for them and in fact see it as a good thing to weed out the weak minded. People who chose to fight each other instead of a common enemy SHOULD go the way of the Dodo. We do not need them; we never have. Also, the elites are only half to blame. Since when did personal accountability stop being a thing? On one hand, the elites lead everyone around by the nose. On the other hand, you have billions of grown men and women who allow themselves to be led around by the nose. I have equal disdain for both.
Nobility? No. But it does carry with it a level of pragmatism. And it is most certainly NOT a game. Like I said, I am being true to my personal values. I would prefer death over oppression, so if I get killed in the process of trying to smash this shit show to pieces then: A. it is not my problem anymore. B. It does not really matter too much because I will be back at some point to try again in some form eventually. I have not set an intent to be destroyed, I have set a standard that I will smash apart my opposition until it kills me or I win. IMO there is nothing wrong with being a juggernaut of sorts in this situation. Someone has to pay that price eventually, and I am not so in love with myself that I shy away from the possibility that it could be me. My template exists for these kind of things.
You are not being a dick, lol, but Operation Hera also had more specific targets. What this thread is suggesting is on such a mass scale that mass chaos could be the only result. Iām not giving my enemies consent so much as I am pointing out that the stakes are high in a fight like this. To go into any kind of battle assuming that you cannot be harmed is a poor idea, to me.
Absolutely, but at the same time, walking in to a fight like this without all involved being aware of the potential consequences is equally dangerous and almost criminal.
I did not feel that way; no apologies needed. Perhaps a change of wording then, but in the spirit I suggest?
Post edit: IMO, by virtue of the fact that you willfully engage in a fight you are giving consent for them to fight back. Also, I said our destruction, it was in the context of humanity, not anyone specifically or myself. Also not neccessarily a bad thing.