Uh what?
3 Likes
I think he is a TI targeted individual. People who think the government is harassing them.
1 Like
This is getting close to political right?
1 Like
This is “gangstalking”
1 Like
I would say we are inching to that border.
4 Likes
I have explained it all on this forum here:
That’s all I can say about this, because the topic will just get locked, because Lady_Eva says, “it is something that magic probably can’t solve”. But I thought there were no limitations for magic.
I know this isn’t the place, but I can’t pm you, so i’ll just do it here.
you are doing this thing where you tell people these things are impossible on purpose, aren’t you? like some weird one man dark night of the soul, inflicting yourself on other people. you have so much experience with things that aren’t normal, or serialized, and you are literally a god in many respects, and so i find it extremely hard to believe your mindset would be so completely shut off. you are doing it on purpose, aren’t you?
Bro… what the hell makes you think you are so damn important for the damn CIA?!
Well, the same think that makes you say that we censor you when you broke our rules or whatever else.
This isn’t the right place to beg others for attention.
1 Like
The theory with the CIA gangstalking stuff is that they hunt certain bloodlines on purpose. It’s marginally credible when you see that a large number of public figures, from spouses who marry into royalty to leading US politicians and major celebrities are, in fact, related, and that the major DNA profiling companies are also closely linked to Google.
However it is also highly political and not a thing we can discuss in-depth, nor fix, with posts on here.
@roulettekid if you made a post about evading unwanted surveillance or spying by “people” and left out the whole CIA/political part, that may be more helpful. Please try to honour both the word & the spirit of our rules - the information is the same whether you got on the wrong side of a local gang, or a national one.
Thanks. 
6 Likes
If you’ve ever been on some of the more obscure imageboards, then you’ll see just how active and aggressive agencies are in the attempt get any form of completely free speech banned. So you’d be surprised. If you’ve been around 4chan in the beginning, then you’ll know that they started spamming (cp) to get it shut down only to relaunch it as a honeypot. Then you had 8chan, this time explicitly prohibiting these kinds of posts or anything inciteful violence, then the agencies did that anyway, it got banned, and once again put back up as a honeypot.
My point in saying this at the risk of violating forum rules, is not to politicize the argument, but to point out that your delusion that the CIA, or any other intelligence agency for that matter, absolutely wouldn’t target individuals or small groups is very naive. Maybe you should do some objective research on it and not just reply emotionally to claims, you know, exactly as they’d want from their subjects.
Then why are you trying to appease the majority by attempting to belittle another?
Well, an interesting side note for you since you seem to be a monotheist, is that the first monotheists were Aryans, notably Zoroastrianism. I mention this because in the Armanist perspective, monotheism is not necessarily separated from polytheism at all, but instead refers to different layers of the ancient Aryan spirituality. Alfred Rosenberg for example, himself heavily involved with the members of the Thule, was convinced that when Zoroaster spoke of Mazda, he was referring to a sort of racial god, because this was a reaction to the waning of the caste system that Aryans seem to have always had. In this period miscegenation was threatening the caste system and in order to counteract it he was appealing to the highest principle and ideal of the racial soul, the racial god Mazda, which stood in opposition to the racial god of the non-Aryans.
In this sense the Armanen reconcile monotheism with polytheism, since both were present in pre-Christian Aryan cultures. This is a reason why as an example, many of the Germanic Christians never believed that they were worshipping the same “god” as the Jews, when the exoteric comprehension of the matter would dictate they’re one and the same, but it was esoterically understood to be a racial god. Jung also didn’t believe that the Germanic Christians were actually worshipping Jehova, but instead indirectly still worshipping the race god, or collective racial unconscious, this is also how “Christianity” was viewed from the perspective of most National Socialists.
The reason I’m telling you this is partially to inspire you to investigate this information and determine whether what you’re praying to is really an external god, such as Wodan or Donar, or the internal god that embodies the highest principle and spiritual destiny of your people (race).
2 Likes
I don’t know why I was tagged here, I’m not a monotheist. I can work with a god just like others work with demons, without worshipping.
1 Like
Would it be too much to ask for you to temporarily un-hide your profile so that I may PM you about something?
1 Like
I would not mind answering any questions in private, however in the interest of not wasting your time in the event that you have only a single enquiry, I will link this video in the attempt to answer that single enquiry if that is in fact the case (if it should not be all that you sought to know, then feel free to message me):
“Can any man be loyal, who is disloyal to himself? Can any man be great, who is consumed with a longing to return to dust? Can any man be strong, who loves weakness? Can any man be proud, who wanders along in humility? Can any man be pure, who regards himself born
in sin? Can any man be happy in this world, who despises the world? And can any man bear the Creator in his soul, who despises divine Creation?
What a strange god you Christians have, who created you upright, but who commands you to crawl to him on your knees!
We heathens do not beg to our Creator; it would be an insult to the divinity in our souls.” - H.H.
I don’t worship anyone either. My apologies for the misunderstanding.
2 Likes
Okay, this is so ridiculous that doesn’t even deserve an answer, but let’s give one just because it will be fun to see the crying.
Seriously? 4chan?
How do YOU know? Do you have any evidence? Or do I have to believe it because a small group of people say so? I only accept magick because I have managed to get results. But research methods exists and should be followed for GOOD reasons. I know it, I used to be a journalist.
You mean, the standar in the internet?
And then you said:
I am the one replying emotionally?! Dude, do you even read what you just wrote?!
I get it, I touched an open wound. I won’t retract. OP isn’t followed by CIA drones (what do they want with him? Are they so unprofessional that any average Joe can find them so easily?)
YES!!! The great conspiracy!!! I forgot! Of course, it all makes sense, because I would be an idiot and you, my friend, would be a the smarter than average dude who KNOWS the truth.
Because I’m not. And what you did is called projection, by the way.
1 Like
Seriously.
I know because I was around when this started happening, I also mentioned to you more “obscure” imageboards that you could investigate yourself since you know, you’re a very impartial ex-journalist who’s absolutely objective and not emotionally invested. Go check out places like endchan, volkchan, anoncafe, etc. Ask them for their archives and maybe they’ll oblige.
It’s illegal to incite violence, and since it’s important for the individuals that use such imageboards to maintain anonymity and have access to as much freedom of speech as possible, they clearly try to not promote or advocate for any kind of illegal activity. Also, if it’s standard why don’t you try inciting violence on this site?
For an objective and impartial investigator you sure seem to formulate a lot of presuppositions. They don’t have to do it covertly, and I’ll explain to you why. It’s a process called hypernomalization, whereby through regular exposure to something considered taboo or abnormal, that subject becomes gradually more acceptable to the general populace. Take for example in the US, you had television shows with black presidents more than a decade before it actually occurred, hypernormalization made this more socially acceptable through overexposure to the subject, I’m not saying this particular case is an example of it being used for a nefarious purpose though.
A more recent example, is the Cuties film, which subject does it deal with and why are they doing such a thing? In reality, it’s clear as daylight why such programming exists, and I wouldn’t be surprised if films of that ilk become more and more prevalent over the years.
So how does this play into the CIA gangstalking? Well, how much programming have you seen that portray conspiracy theorists as crazy people, encouraging people to laugh it off and sweep it under a rug? There are tons of documents pertaining to such activities as described that have been leaked, if you’d like, I can link you to a massive trove of documents pertaining to MK Ultra, MK Often, MK Search, and Stargate, among others. The methodology used in perceived gangstalking, appears to me a logical evolution of the way they used to select abductees during these programs. Imagine for a second you had a perfectly sane neighbor, who disappeared for a few days then turned up and was suddenly much different and acting crazy, who would eventually go on to commit some kind of crime. Would that make sense?
Well allegedly during gangstalking people become more paranoid throughout the process, they break in to your apartment and move or take things that only you would know about, this is an example of how they use psychological warfare on the target. So what these operations result in is the neighbor slowly becoming “crazy” in the eyes of his community, thus much more believable, unlike some hippy that vanished and suddenly reappeared much different. Makes a lot of sense to me that it’s an evolution of the methodology, if you don’t agree then we’ll leave it at that.
Your reaction to the utterance of conspiracy, is an example of the desired outcome of the aforementioned hypernormalization programming. You do realize that the US, was conspired to exist. You do realize, that the space program by both the Soviets and the US were build on National Socialist scientists who were decades ahead of them in that field, and that this “conspiracy” is well documented. Why do you react so emotionally to the idea that there could be more conspiracies? Surely, if you went around telling normal people about your belief in magic, they’d consider you crazy too? Thus it would seem to be in your nature to be more open to these ideas, since there are sane people among both communities. The unfortunate reality is the few truly crazy people are drawn to both, however that doesn’t illegitimize either.
It’s called projection? So by coming to the defense of the individual the majority of posters were condemning based on espousing beliefs they did not care to hear, I was projecting that you, who were stating the obvious in apparent unison with the forum consensus regarding the individual’s beliefs, were looking for acknowledgement or recognition from the majority? I don’t think you comprehend the words you use.
1 Like
You bored me to death, but I will tell you something about this: maybe I worded it wrong, or maybe you didn’t read right, but that was not what I meant.
I meant that, yeah, it is illegal to incite violence and therefore it is standard for websites to not allow it. That’s what I said.
1 Like
‘really odd that people don’t believe the CIA stuff but claim to talk to important spirits.’
Lol, true
6 Likes
@ lady_eva please rename post to warzone
1 Like
@LadyEva