Just should have worded your arguement properly, thats the only thing I disagreed with.
Over wording at that
Perhaps my wording is off, no need to loose sleep over it and it wasnāt a argument it is research and theory.
But then again the Quran is always known for bad wording.
classic
Ah, ok so atleast you admit it.
Um yeah i admit my wording is off, like before Laith Wavey said, no point niitpicking on typos.
The majority of Muslim scholars have rejected the historicity of the incident on the basis of their weak isnads (chains of transmission) and the incompatibility of the incident with the theological doctrine of 'isma (Prophetic infallibility, divine protection of Muhammad from mistakes).[1][3] Non-Muslim scholars on the other hand have largely accepted the historicity.[4]
From Satanic Verses - Wikipedia
I always had the a strong feeling that the Arab spring a few years back was the product of a coven doing magick that was not from the area and missed the nuance in the political structure.
Ah right now i get it, but who was he asking about the chain, iām so lost and filled with drousy sleep deprivation
That wasnāt me, actually the Clinton hag heavily supported that stuff, and look how wonderfully it turned out, peace and prosperity within those countries and a brighter futurte between Islam and the west every day!
Right?
Your up from yesterday? I always thought I was chatting with the witching hour crowd that canāt sleep after ritual.
Make Arabia Pagan Again.
Iāve been up for three days, only now calmed down from clubbing, dancing and evocations what a fucking mixture
Ok then, sounds good to me.
Gāday mate
When youāve caught some sleep (I know that feeling), check these out properly:
Itās quite a big deal, so the history is important.
Yeah iāll bookmark it right now, thanks Eva.
Thereās actually an underground movement for that.
Really? I could get into that.