I’m very curious if you ended up hypothetically deciding to do a blood line curse on someone for whatever reason, what do you think are some justifications to that cause something constantly runs in my head. “He or she was the transgressor why am I punishing his or her kids then their kids then their kids”
Seems slightly unnecessary to me lol. But I don’t know that’s why I’m asking you all. Perhaps someone who ruins families somehow and you ruin their’s back or something. I just don’t see why you would proceed to punish the entire blood line for one person pissing you off. But then again everyone has their own reasoning and morals everyone thinks some things deserve different punishments then others lol.
These sorts of curses make much more sense from a rational standpoint throughout other parts of history, especially among any noble or royal bloodlines. Between warring families, regions, countries, and so on, such curses would have been highly beneficial to use against someone else if it meant their power and fortunes waned. It had the potential to get rid of problems for their own descendants in a lasting way.
Where less lofty matters of inheritance were a concern, a bastard child or another branch of the family might be the recipient of such a curse as well. Similar to nobles, there is usually some favourable aspect of doing this meant to benefit their own children.
There are also personal reasons one could want to curse someone for this, though the more personal they get, the more spite seems to be a motivating factor. Spurned love is a common one — they don’t get to have descendants with the person they desired, so they curse that person’s bloodline out of revenge.
Then of course there’s the notion of ruining one’s legacy far into the future. Some would rather see themselves cursed instead of watching their children and grandchildren fail and fall apart.
Usually a curse is a blessing misused or no longer apply in this current reincarnation. It’s just the qualities that your ancestors have developed heavily will run through the blood of descendants. So if your ancestors have developed Anger/ brutality during war periods to protect themselves, that quality will passed out to descendants. Now imagine you are living in a peaceful country, neighborhood and family but you carry in you extreme anger and brutality where if someone mess with you, you can beat him up and kill him. Potentially leading you to prison. Someone would consider it as a curse but it’s just a blessing misused.
I remember when I was doing a birth chart reading, I saw a curse that would make him a bandit or thug. I told him if he has been involved in crime or something illegal. He told me no and it was even the contrary, he was gentle, polite with good manner… but later when talking about his career. He told me he’s an actor, and most of his roles are a thug or someone in a mafia.
And I really laughed.
Without knowing he probably did his own remedy. When you detect an ancestral “curse” than it probably the biggest blessing in your in disguise and one should know how to use it.
I found that the biggest remedy to a curse is to actually accept and accommodate it.
You have anger issues? That probably you would make an excellent soldier, sportsman, combat sport, an industrialist, a leader in a company.
Someone cursed with money? Then these people would make the best investor manager, hedge fund managers, banker etc because they will always earn on someone else money which becomes like an inheritance.
Cursing with purchasing a house ? Then this is a yoga for a real estate developer or agents
People are emotional and get a bit crazy when angry. It doesn’t really matter what the justification is, they’ll rationalize anything in any way they can to feel like the good guy and not the monster. The arguments don’t have to make sense and probably don’t.
Morals are purely subjective in my view. Personally, I would never seek harm against people for simply being related to my enemies.
I suspect that when people seek to target a bloodline, they are responding to either (or both) a cultural perspective or a weird take on an evolutionary perspective.
In terms of the former, I gather that in some societies it was common that if you sought to slay a foe, you would want to eliminate their offspring to pre-empt the culturally prescribed obligation on the children to avenge the slaying of their forebears.
In terms of the latter, there is perhaps the position that anything of the same genetic lineage as something that is a threat to me is potentially an intrinsic threat to me by default perspective.
Either way, I personally am not supportive of targeting people for things that someone other than they themselves have done
The common idea that the children shall suffer for the sins of their father comes from the Bible.
“The Lord is slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love, forgiving iniquity and transgression, but he will, by no means clear the guilty, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and fourth generation.”
Numbers 14:18
“Prepare slaughter for his sons because of the guilt of their fathers, lest they rise and possess the earth, and fill the face of the earth with cities.” (in modern terms, get them before they grow powerful enough to get you)
Isaiah 14:21
Of course, as with everything else, the Bible also contradicts itself.
“Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children, and children shall not be put to death because of their fathers. Each one shall be put to death for their own sin.”
Deuteronomy 24:16
“The soul who sins shall die. The son shall not suffer for the iniquity of the father, not the father suffer for the iniquity of the son. The righteousness of the righteous shall be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon himself.”
It’s complicated if you decide to do it you will need to sacrifice something of importance to you like a ring you are wearing for 20 years or give the spirits some important childhood picture or similar because the immediate consequence might be a serious illness.
