Evocation of Azi Dahaka Video

[quote=“E.A., post:38, topic:2491”][quote=“Orismen, post:25, topic:2491”]I was thinking of that too. I don’t know how far EA got into the LDS church but he could be a priest.

I know I technically still am an Elder in the LDS church since I have not be excommunicated nor have I left.[/quote]

I’m an Elder, and I was 2 steps away from receiving Keys before I left (this will only make sense to Elders, for the most part).

E.A.[/quote]

We should go on a home teaching assignment. It would be awesome lol.

1 Like

[quote=“E.A., post:40, topic:2491”]1. Thanks for explaining why you’re using a circle of stones instead of your UC. So, a circle of stone and burnt ashes are part of Persian occult tradition? Thanks for that. Are you working from any Persian text(s)?

E.A.: A circle of stones is pretty universal, and the addition of the burnt ashes was a recommendation from a fellow who is devoted to Ahriman, and it intuitively made sense, and seemed to work rather well! It has been difficult to research, as this system has been so obscured (intentionally, of course) by the RHP religions that are afraid of Ahriman. Most of the persian texts that I’ve been able to devour are written from the antithetical vantage, by followers of Zoroaster or Islam or the like. I have, of course, studied these texts, as well as whatever I could find of the Yzedi people, which is difficult to find anything accurate about them as well. Like most of my work, I’ve had to enter into communion with the spirits themselves in order to piece together this ritual.

  1. Ok, so it’s safe to assume that your intention was not to get a prophecy or a revelation, rather it was to gain knowledge of witchcraft and demonic power? All right. The description of the email says you were going for a prophecy and revelation, but you already stated that you understand my confusion, so very well.

E.A.: I indeed was trying to obtain a prophecy and revelation. I wanted to gain prophecy concerning my own Ascent, and revelation to the next steps to take. I most definitely did receive more than I considered that I might! Whether what was spoken is applicable to anyone other than me is another story. As I unravel my own understandings of this, I do think that what was channeled is applicable to everyone, though!

  1. Well, I’ll have to disagree with the felt-presence aspect, at least without other methods of discerning the spirit’s presence but results are the hallmark and if you saw results then who am I to argue. All right, so what I understand you’re saying is that it started out to be an evocation but turned into a possession as you went further into it? Am I right here?

E.A.: Yes, being able to materialize a visible form is important to the western magician, and indeed I’ve also seen that the more concrete the vision and the voice are to the individual, the more potent the results of the ritual usually are. However, my statement wasn’t whether it was better or worse, but only what the approach would likely have been in an authentic Yatuki ritual… again, to the best of my knowledge. Again, it has been difficult to research, as this system has been so obscured (intentionally, of course) by the RHP religions that are afraid of Ahriman, but the very nature of Azi Dahaka is one of transformation of the self, of the full unleashing of the Kundalini serpent within. This cannot happen save for within the self and the Self. So, yes, it did become a possession… not the first, nor the last that I’ll undergo![/quote]

Thanks. You’ve helped clear up my confusion. I do think, however, that future titles and descriptions of newletters/emails should reflect exactly what is happening in the video. That can alleviate any future confusion. Thanks again.

1 Like

That feel when watching the video you think E.A. is in your kitchen because the two places look pretty much exactly alike.

I am preforming my own investigation of Zoroastrianism, trying to parse out a LHP. In your sources, EA, you mentioned a Mary Boise. Did you mean Mary Boyce?

You give an interesting point here. Because on that paradigm theres no such polarity like Kabbalah-Qlipphot system. But at the same time, one would speculate if Ahriman is not the hyperconciousness of the First 3 Emanations. Of course, that changes the paradigm to another level. But Im speculating…

Yes, that’s it! I picked up her book “Zoroastrians: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices.” It’s okay, although very slanted towards traditional Zoroastrianism, claiming that even Zurvanism is a diabolical perversion of Zorastrianism… so her ability to give rational and historical information on Daevic Worship is nonexistent.

One of the best resources that I’ve found is actually a text that is written to disuade from the Daevic and even the Zurvanic paths. In doing so, a great amount of information concerning Daevic sacrifice, ritual, etc. is revealed. This book is called: Zurvan: A Zoroastrian Dilemma," written by Robert Charles Zaehner. I was able to find a copy for only a few hundred dollars, but you can easily pay a couple grand for it. Almost as absurd as the cost of my printed works… almost.

2 Likes

I found it intersting EA that you first assumed that Azi Dahaka would be a seperate being or emanation from Ahriman. When you were describing Azi Dahaka and how he became the embodiment of Ahriman in the physical. While it makes sense to assume they would be seperate as Ahriman existed outside of Azi Dahaka before his transformation, I couldn’t help but think of Jesus being the physical emanation of the divine as a comparison to Azi Dahaka. So while they are seperate in the material/ethereal forms they are one and the same.

Would you say trying to evoke Azi Dahak through the power and authority of Ahriman would be similar (without regard to paradigm, and context of light dark of course) to one attempting to evoke Jesus through the authority of God? The physical or once physical being was the material shell that the “divine” exercises its power and will through which makes them one in the same except for a title which is nothing more than a distinction between the physical and astral?

Yes, it is a very similar thing, and it’s not surprising, as the Jesus myth was influenced quite directly by Mithras, from the Zoroastrian system, so similarities between the two systems are bound to be apparent.

1 Like

I’m curious to see the influence this anti cosmic force will have on your current work, E.A. Very interesting video for you to make as sharing it can and will cause some effects on others. Always good to bring some Chaos!

EA, Boyce is a great first step for an academically treated intro to the subject, though of course she is certainly
slanted. When I get a chance to type at a computer instead of this annoying kindle, I’ll trade some resources with you. I’m interested in this subject for my own reasons, including the possibility of a totally amoral left hand path pre-Zoroastrian spirituality. I’ll be purchasing Ford’s treatment on the topic, but I am slightly sceptical concerning some of his research skills. I’d check him against his sources closely.

At TWF: the entire Judiac system was highly influenced by Persian spirituality, even mentioning Cyrus as an agent of YHWH. The Magi mentioned in the NT may even be a reference to a Medean tribe of Avestan priests who predate Zoroastrianism and who may have resisted its influence. …as a side note, this is an avenue I’d explore for a LHP, for reasons I’ll elaborate upon later.

There are a few chapters in Evola’s Doctrine of Awakening that help put the proto Iranian-indians in context. Also, everyone seems to agree that the Rig Veda reflects some of this pre Zoroastrian influence.

I had the priveledge of watching this video and it is extremely potent, so much so that a couple of days ago i sensed a really powerfull energy swirling around me and my body tingled and reacted to it. I thought it was a chief demon or something that way. i was intreagued. so i decided to ask my mentor Azazel could it be Arimahn and he sid yes it was,and he said he wanted to meet me. But i dont think im prepared yet, i dont want to bite of more than i can chew.

There is an excellent book by Georges Dumezil called The Plight of A Sorcerer, which details the prototypical Kavi found in both the Zoroastrian and Rig Vedic tradition. This is essentially what you are looking for, as these LHP Kavis survived the Zoroastrian reformation through heresy and even the Magi, who apparently got themselves back into the priest business of Zoroastrianism and promptly inserted some of the older proto-Iranian-Indian beliefs. Undoubtedly, they preserved Deava worship.

1 Like

I am interested in Dr. Stephen Flowers book, The Lords of the LHP, which has a chapter on Zoroastrian LHPers. Other than that, though, this shit is hard to find. Flowers, btw, is a LHP practitioner and academically specializes in Runic magick.

It would be awesome for you to do a presentation on LHP Persian magick at some point, for those of us who are drawn to that sort of thing.

Oh wow! Its too bad I don’t live in London. I’d love to have a peek inside.

If your going to work with Persian entities, learn how to pronounce them properly. Listening to EA and Michael Ford butcher Azi Dahaka makes me laugh.
You would think Michael Ford with his so-called Persian magic know how would “know how” to pronounce things properly.

Love that part.^^
Now i feel ease, towards certain Things. :smiley:

I feel a draw towards Azi Dahaka.

If I do a ritual, I’ll record it…

1 Like

Gonna have to look harder, a couple of lesser devils or imps were impersonating them. Threw an entire night away.

1 Like