What is your opinion of doreen virtue?
She has been called fraud after she has denounced tarot.
What do you think?
Personally I have never been into her works, she does not seen sincere to me.
What is your opinion of doreen virtue?
She has been called fraud after she has denounced tarot.
What do you think?
Personally I have never been into her works, she does not seen sincere to me.
I used to really like her. Iâve read at least one of her books called âThe Lightworkerâs Way.â
I donât believe in the New Age or RHP path anymore. I personally think theyâre a manipulative and hypocritical control system that suppresses our true development, controls us and probably feeds off us. Does that mean the archangels people evoke have sinister intentions towards us? Well no, I donât think so. But I believe there are definitely sinister beings out there impersonating archangels as well as re-labeling angelic energies and angels. I donât and canât work with angels right now.
Anyway⌠I personally trust Doreen Virtue as a person, but I believe she is ensnared in a malignant and deceiving spiritual path that is a control system. In her book âThe Lightworkerâs Wayâ she described her spiritual journey and at one - truly sad and telling - point, she described a moment when she fiercely rejected God out of pure stubbornness, only to later submit and surrender. That âfierce rebellionâ of hers I believe was a deep instinct that recognized we as consciousness are limitless beings, limitless like demons and not constricted to a âhigher serviceâ and rules of conduct like âangelsâ are. But of course, since she couldnât see this urge of hers in its true revelatory light, in the end she knew no other option but to go back to submitting to the forces controlling her.
Itâs rarely the case that just because you have a different opinion on one thing a person thinks that everything they say is also disagreeable.
Thatâs called âthrowing the baby out with the bathwaterâ and itâs usually an unfortunate mistake.
I canât think of a single author I donât have some fundamental disagreement with. Itâs sometimes a 50/50 thing. Sometimes itâs a semantics thing and Iâve misunderstood.
Itâs definitely a good idea to use your discernment and not automatically believe everything you read⌠but read it all with an open mind. Then just keep what works for you, and donât worry about the rest.
Try to stay out of personal judgement - thatâs a childâs attitude, to equate disagreement with âthat person is bad/fake/etcâ - and hold off on making opinions about content you didnât personally read until youâve done so and thought about it, each bit for itâs own merits.
If you read sources that do that - make personal judgements out of mere difference of opinion - it tells you more about that source than it does about the subject - proceed with caution, you are reading emotional material, not thought though, logical data.
Personally, Iâm reading her 'The Magical Battle of Britain" about the historical use of magik during the 2nd world war, and itâs fascinating. Iâm not having any problems so far, but I wonât make a firm decision until Iâve finished it
As an example that Iâm having issues with right now, Iâm also reading Julius Evola âEros and the Mysteries of Loveâ, and had to turn a blind eye to what I saw as a lot of long-winded whining in the first chapter about how he hated the culture he lived in, he made sweeping statements that made no sense and concocted straw-man arguments to back them up. Huge turn off and I wanted to walk away before the actual subject even started. Now Iâm into it he might turn out to be a 50/50 dude, Iâm having to actually work on maintaining equanimity until Iâve heard him out.