As Empyrean93 refs, there are a lot of diff definitions, but I sense that what is in Dante’s bk (and other such nfo-currents) is more below the surface (could be disturbing if done literally, but even then the simple answer to the simple question is no).
I was thinking about Taoist/even the literal “rei”-ki and the art of the Aughads, but I think my contribs aren’t adding to this.
(strange to read the comment “I don’t think he crossing the line too bad lol.” -implying don’t agree and then next- to write you don’t know what is meant by that term either…)
but if someone wanted to msg a particular person either direct to that indiv or else not seek to have the first and last response.. I don't mention for this thread as much as for this forum. It seems the death-energy might have stultified the thinking for the last few months, I wonder if it will change.
[quote=“empyrean93”]I don’t think he crossing the line tooo bad lol.
I don’t belive that “Death Essence” is really talked about in such a specific way. I could be wrong,
I don’t really know what “Death Essence” is, I could speculate.
I believe the interview pretty much sums it up. Big ups DantE!!![/quote]
But there was a lot I found in the videos/interviews that Dante did, but not what was actually said (just repeating my prior comment in this post), but different approaches can bring the discoveries and injection of/contribution of something new. -so I found reading another’s thoughts on this interesting.
Salute to Empyrean93 for Svoboda ref, and how that can expand the Dante, EA, and other currents, into a larger whole.