Also I’d say a big issue- I’m hoping greatly this will be addressed in the Mastering Evocation Course, as well as being a topic discussed more on this forum- that relates to the confusion of the 2 “types of sigils”…
Is many Create symbols that resonate with a collection of thoughts (and if activates the “subconscious” and reflects upon the LivingImagination- can be interacted with, seen to move and speak…)
and if one has one’s Individual “intent” (can send Will to create a seed- to affect change, ex the CandleBurning rites)…
combine those two and believe one is contacting an Other, and just “contacting” working with… vs Contacting An Actual Other (Entity)
-I’m not sure if that makes sense (that one can summon and work with any concept by designing a symbol, vs AOS atavistic resurgence and/or tapping certain levels-of Desire -parts of his system- that were interpreted as just indicating ideas)
this became clear to me after working with such “astral-mental” patterns vs concrete contact when I began learning Taoist Energy working (like having worked with circuit-boards yet no power turned on… then plug it in, and contrast with the pure voltage of a Tesla Coil and Lightning itself)… but until contact, hard to recog the distinction
I hope above might make sense, I recog it isn’t as clear, as I’m wishing to clarify to myself- I’d like to be more clear how to ask for clarity on this (per EA’s recent work on Omnipotence Course)- but to have the clarity to ask for it clearly anyway-
So if you were looking to only use the “second type” of sigil (not involving entity) that’s a way to go also- I mention it, as you ask the way to make the change, and what better way than working with another Being that is Energy-Power itself (who is consonant with that purpose, and thus finding one- reqs clarifying etc.)
You write: “not seeing how this creates a link to a physical object” (other refs, not only on the forum, but other writings, seem to fall in the “pour a type of liquid into, or stuff an Energy-Charge into-Packit” -which is not the only “Model of Working” -there are many
(for ex: enter Trance- WakingLucid dr go on Journey to “Find” and bring back a dream version of the Talis Object (ring in this case)- upon return Wake-up, still “holding” aware of that "Dream-Object- without losing that Found-Quality… and Put it into the Ring…
or Delve-Dive down into the underlying structure of the WeavePattern that is beneath the “ring” and yet is also “supporting” the circumstances you wish to Change (as was, and the deisred to be) once contact- the “base-code” so to speak… change that… then return back up to Normal without losing that fix… until clear in mind, in the Temple space… then let it go… etc.
or bring another (like an Entity) and have them change the Waveform from the Talisman, the affect that it will have upon things… etc… (and the how, is up to that Entity)… etc.
Different models- not only Infuse into a blankslate (literally a Hermetic model, thus the hermetic-seal of chemistry)
But any of above I see two versions- one that one can script and go through in the usual state of mind, vs Shifting into that “Rapture state” that brings the Crossroads through YOU into the PhyEnviro of the Working
(I find reading words written in that state of mind a challenge, as well as recalling memorized, so easily speechless…
-just as so easy to drift and go Inward before reaching the Crossroads)
- To really begin such a Working, as this, one reaches and sustains a state where one feels power and connection and IS in such a way, one no longer wants to act- no need to. And yet remember and trigger the action, but how make sense to do so in that state? <<That state of mind, and how it will and does now view what you are seeking to do, how will you See-Understand it in that state, and thus operate from it... flowing the Rapture through you and filling your room,...
[this is a reason I see why shorthand indicators, very few (if not singular- at a time) purposes… all “thinking” done prior, so that in the Working- its just connecting a couple of things, etc. Simplicity and Clarity
(and yet what we think “that other state” will be like, or should be like, or whatever may not relate to what it is: the key is just a few times stepping into it… accustom to via practice… thus EA’s 5 times, just enough to operate from, then reflect on…)
gee I included more than a couple of ideas here (it seems to me the main concepts require the completeness or else a partial concept is more misleading than none- and the important foundation is contrary to our "usual-culture" or else this would be what we do all the time. I hope this isn't too long and someone can parse pieces out of this....
if any agree with above pts, I'd love to have more exposition by EA in courses upcoming.