I see what you mean, but im not necessarily talking about cursing left and right for small stuff
Im talking more repeated, cyclical type shit. People repeating the same actions, habits, behaviors, that keep affecting you in any way regardless of family, friends, or relationship (human or Divine).
One can handle the small stuff, but its when that small stuff starts to build and amount to bigger and bigger agitation/annoyance that action has to be taken, to me
I wasnât talking to you directly.
But yes. Repeated offenses by one person is an issue of drawing boundaries. Otherwise you are letting yourself get walked all over like a welcome matt.
And for myself: there are several methods of taking care of such things that I can choose from based on the gravity of the offense.
Morality is messy messy messy.
But I think these are good conversations to have. Itâs nice to see where others stand.
In the words of one famous (if fictional) black Mage: âthere is no good and evil, there is only power and those too weak to seek it.â
Then again, those who argue that thereâs no good and evil usually tend to be classified as âevilâ by the rest of us. 
That whole argument automatically assumes that a person who has power above what society would normally permit will act in ways that harm others, though. 
I would substitute that with this: the person will do what they think will fulfil them, and that this wonât automatically mean a net harm, or a long-term harm, to anyone else - a classic example would be having total power and going back in time to kill Pol Pot, for example.
Mostly in life I think we just want what we want, and we look for fancy philosophies to tart that up, this is why I abandoned study of them! 
Well thank you 
Nah, no good, no evil as those are human terms based solely on perspective.
My âmoralsâ and âethicsâ are purely this:
Respect
Even if its the shared respect of staying out of one anotherâs way, its still Respect, and with respect comes a host of things I value over everything.
That actually kinda proves my point above, you seldom see anyone who is universally considered to be âgoodâ pushing that line. 
Well why on the godsâ green planes would they? 
they havenât accepted both sides of the coin, and arenât willing to become the âbad guyâ if the need ever arose.
This is correct they are just a construct, I go from the heart, if I love you Then I love you and am good to you because you are good to me but when people fuck with me or my family I take care of it with not equal but much more force.
This is where the law of three comes into play. Not the Wicca law of the return of three but my law of I return in threes. Be good to me you will get it back x3 fuck with me and mine and you get fucked back 3x as hard. Not to mention when they fuck with us they are fucking with all nine of us and not just one person we are one in nine and nine in one. 
While you may be banned, allow me to add salt to the wound, especially since youâre my stalker by saying, youâre are utterly incorrect.
I agree with Velotak, as usual 
.
In all seriousness, morals are limiting. Why constrain what and why you do something? This is supposed to be the year you lot break your limits come onâŚ
So basically are you saying that your basic ethic is to nurture life and not just human life?
I went back into the archives and found this thread. I probably should have done an archives search before I started a new thread.
The Black Path ironically entails an ethos just as the Sacred Red Road does: Spurning altruism,and restraint, for example, become necessities.
How about this viewpoint:
given action is good for one being, bad for another:
Food consumption.
To be exact, Meat.
Steak for example.
Have to be a living creature and then is killed and eaten by us.
Bad for the Cow. Very bad.
Good for us, becouse it keeps us nutrated.
HmmâŚ
A Lion eatâs a Human -Bad for the Human.
NowâŚ
Of course these are theoretical.
But the point is, once you learn to leave your own viewpoint, and go into that of who ever is in front of you, youâll learn to adjust to any situation. 
But do we, really, leave our own viewpoints and tackle our daily lives indifferently? What would your thoughts be, just by simply taking a stroll in the city with visual impressions of people passing by, or of something happening in your surroundings? If you just shrug your shoulders, thinking you donât really care, itâs still a statement of your own point of view.
We always have impressions to deal with every single day. And we deal with these impressions by our own point of view.