What I understand (just my 2cents) below seems to have certain understandings that may have informed your questions (and thus how you interp’d responses)
<< 1)U say Lucifer,Paimonetc demons r as powerful as LOA.But EA himself states that the LOA cannot even be banished like demons and you cant come out of their grasp unless they want you to >>
Indeed, the issue is whether one can banish-dismiss demon-Entities if they wish not to…? Issue being whether one is in contact with the Actually Entity, vs a Thoughtform-expression (partial and say “inspired” and informed by that Entity, but in one’s Mind)
just as IN a dream one can Dream of a Personage, and your dream may just be your conscious thoughts of them, can be more your “unconscious” thoughts that may included more collective tapping… may have more or less of that being in your dream reacting-communicating as they would, per a connection with them as a deeper level (like checking with their Uncon how they’d respond and using that to choose how “your” dream acts)… still not them -directly
vs being in what some traditions call a “Big Dream” where one is out of one’s Mind place into the shared- and encounter something that is not at all via your Mind (thus Directly encountering Else, vs Indirectly and only your Mind no matter how informed or inspired that might be).
ie more or less resonating-harmonically with the entity- "They" are there, although the form/aspects etc likely more via your predilictions... how to judge which? (as if in their "home" Entities have 2 arms and 2 legs?- so their form is already assumed... and other personality traits? but if exper without those filter-interps) <<how then might they appear?>>
-and may just be “subconscious mind forms” that aren’t them at all (not imposter spirits exactly, but not just conscious mind pretend- but like in a dream, actually “alive” but a complex-ie a portion of your subcon reacting as if an Entity… test can be ask them to do, and they do- results happen? and yet can’t one’s subcon perhaps cause-drive magical results? so is there an Else-Other?
If an Other is there- perhaps in a way the Mind and even your Energy can't recognize (either Shadow-fliter out or think part of you...) or if you recog: Something is here: in that case, They are Here... then apples and apples (compare vs apples and oranges etc.)
and regards the reincarnation- the key seems to be, as I understand EA, Become a Living God is a process and something that happens (over time, and with struggle) and once that occurs- things are different… but not just is
<<Reincarnation seems to be even supported by Robert Bruce and EA(in his new $20ebook he wrote about being able to steal the sceptre from Lord Yama and to evade the need for reincarnation) >> if I recall correctly- that EA quote is from the end of the LeftHand path Ch… about SelfDeifying… (?)
I think (I don’t want to put words in) that above post-comment would make sense then ie “after that” as EA put it- there is a choice… but reincarnation is usual interp as just the flow- next step automatic (vs a computer file erased- unless while it is “active in the computer” before it is erased - it becomes a program of selfgenerating electrons not in Memory-chips… but freeexisting-selfsustaining… or however the development path can be expressed- (stretched metaphor ?)
[Robert Bruce has diff parts of his books as I recall that could be interpd in diff ways to this- he may have directly stated about reincarnation occurring regardless of development, not sure- but if that followed his Projection-N E Ways techs, it seems that might be implying a context of created energy.... but
I don’t think R Bruce and his system would be considered LeftHand Path, and thus not have the assumptions of that Chapter (other Contexts of EA may not imply that- like the Right Hand Path Ch in the Ebk).
above may be a bit rushed and compressed but I wasn’t sure if above was missed or already known and I missed the real issue -either way, luck
(ps many issues in this even practical experiments, get swept up by the “Everybody knows…” so tempting to follow the crowd-thoughts… and for ex the David Icke reference often gets a “chuckle” or “seriously” or whatever… many often ref David Icke thinks Illuminati are reptillians (2nd 3rd 4th hand). Just like many magick- espec “Chaos magic” “magic-pragmatique” or whatever it is called- is usually the same ‘everyone knows’ but the original source hasn’t been read… <just as a ref of the kind of confusion in asking a question, let alone gen magic concepts>
you may have meant this in your question, but in terms of answers- let alone discussion about it- for ex David Icke collected interviews from many and a common element arose; referencing Reptilian.. and then he saw how many cultures had such comments etc.
(I'm not knowledgable in his works, but gets me how often people hear- that Icke is trying to push an agenda about Reptiles.. and perhaps he is: but 1) there is else he says, but throw out everything if question one part "baby with bathwater" as well as distraction tech and 2) what's really going on there- beyond that word.
Tricky kind of question also for you to ask- as has a lot of elements in it: who illuminati, are there, what they like, what kind of "magic" might they do, Icke vs others that speak-research about, esoteric Illuminati vs just social-manip Illuminati... in present time vs in times past... control of the social-matrix vs control-influence of magical-fields.. etc. Seems that many forums complex issue gets filtered.
Part of what other responders replied could come to the issue of concrete-expers… and thus Model-prediction-test method (ie what could one experiment or thereby look for what others have already done- but seeking to find such a common element to illustrate the question- sort of like a 2ndhand info testing)
(that last part ended a bit rushed- but figured might as well just jam more in,vs leaving it out)- hope it adds something… cheers