I’m glad personally you posted about this- I have to admit when I saw the title of the video, I was a bit perplexed (as it seemed it would be a gimme… a set-up so to speak)
<< -by which I mean the subject-matter, not the personalities involved. >>
- but then I guessed perhaps it was to be inflammatory, and less a content video, but to get YouTube association/links, keywords- perhaps comment-troll-activity, etc… to spur visibility-traffic?
-I don’t know, but it does keep on the subject and give oppor to re-state the ideas from prior video-outline of pts from upcoming book- so on-topic… (I was glad to see that pts were listed in the description of the video- so I didn’t view the vid- just read what it said… it didn’t seem to have other aspects than that?)
But I wonder if all those that jumped on the threads-questioning about Left-hand path vs Right-hand path previously, and all said- “we just do a little of both, I make my own path which includes some of each- and is in the ‘middle’ …” [as well as just blurred together: left-right hand, baneful-beneficial magic, dark-light magic(k)… 3 different dichotomies- not all clumped, IMO… but all the activity on the board previously, they were just all the same thing, per the flood of responses… -I only write this wondering if the tide might see the pts Timothy, and now EA, recently put forth, and now follow that, or if there will be an upswelling of that same response of many saying- Left and Right are the same path…
(let alone "tapping the LHP ‘current’ " is not just following a path… but to tap the Current, one is following, not just brushing, a set-way =path).
[this ‘current’ is only accessible to Power your Work and Devel, when it is avail to you]…
< and distinguishing say LHP-beneficial, or RHP-dark … LHP-“light” etc. >
Is following a path, "following" a set-way, if setting-one's own path (which is fine, but seems to be purposely self-misleading, to frame it as "following" vs a set of recipes, as well as developmental stages)- just my proposal, to be clear and call it what it is... I think that would clarify many questions.
[for exploration of the meaning-of-the-terms-used… http://www.amazon.com/Demons-Flesh-Complete-Guide-Left-Hand/dp/184068061X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1428485297&sr=8-1&keywords=demons+of+the+flesh is better than “Lords of the left-hand path”… as the first explores terminology and helps expose assumptions… (perhaps also see- http://www.amazon.com/Real-Magic-Introductory-Treatise-Principles/dp/0877286884/ref=la_B000APJQI2_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1428485647&sr=1-1)
Personally, I wonder if muddleheaded-ness (or as OP above refs bubblehead-edness?) is a result of indistinct words all mixed, all about the same- yet precise thinking can come from precise recognition of what one means, as both a starting pt as well as developing premises.
I don’t know if this is just a one-time ‘debate’ or if the idea of developing/elucidating-unfolding concepts… might match-up with presentation in book-form, or if in addition there might be dialogue (which recent questions by forum-posters could address)… just a thought while this surfaces- in the forum? just via EA’s video talks, or… (as those here, and elsewhere, walk with each other a bit- as when seek alone, yet together) << -whether the ideas or the popularity is the focus >>
-It does seem this subject arose and faded within a single day, on to the next… perhaps more productive if it had been less a ‘mob-mentality’ of <what do ‘we’ think> dogma-keywords-style… either way, the wind-shifts.