re 5D and 6D: whether one is looking from the perspective like how Barbara Hand Clow writes of lvls of mind (1 to 9, sort of like a chakra concept of development, as how Developmental-psych whether Maslow or Piaget has steps- each giving a “higher” wider perspective). or using the perspective of “dimensions” as used in some scientific-conventions (4D is only time in regards to a 3D space model, as all that did “chalkboard physics/math” distance was often “horizontal” while change (movement in height or rising/falling in E, or change in Price in Econ) was on the “vertical”…
that doesn’t mean that it is a 2D diagram, only that 2Dims are used in that sort of array (to have a set of 4 variables that change “over time” <which thus adds a 5th var> means a 5dim array is needed- etc.
The trick of saying “the” 4th dim- confuses as that is used as a Conventional-std in a model of events… (map not the territory, thus neither is “the graph”) but also in 4D space you can’t really call “one of the Dims” 4… anymore than you can look at a book and See “height, depth, width” (which of those is 1st? which is “the” 2nd Dim?) and if you have a banana (anything that is less cube-like)… an odd shape is even more so- as it isn’t a cube- just slightly twist it and suddenly what was height (up and down) on the banana is now a different part).
but the key is that even the concept (working model? -application via use, vs “truth”) of Consciousness is 5th… that also would tie to the line “The illusion behind the illusion.”
“Where did you go?” “where does a song goes when the singing stops?” (where does it come from when the song is sung again?) ~ “John Dies at the End”