Dispelling the Myths of Ignorance

Imagine this: you’re visiting a friend, and he points to a portrait of his ancestors and says, “These are my relatives—criminals and swindlers.” You’re perplexed: “But why do you call them that?” He shrugs: “That’s what a judge called them a hundred years ago—and I’ve gotten used to it.”

Sounds absurd? But that’s exactly what we do when we call our gods demons.

These epithets—“demons,” “archdemons,” “lords of evil”—didn’t originate in folk tradition. They were affixed by the structures of the Sephiroth, the demiurge, and Ain +. This isn’t a description of an essence—it’s a label created to reduce majestic forces to the level of malevolent beings capable only of destruction.

Why is this important?

Because words aren’t just sounds. They carry energy, an image, an association. And when we repeat these labels, we unwittingly:

feed foreign propaganda;

reinforce the myth in the public consciousness that our gods are “dark forces”;

position ourselves as “enemies of humanity,” even though our practice is aimed at development, healing, and empowerment.

What do our gods give us?

Everyone who interacts with them directly knows the truth:

they help us work through fears and complexes;

transform us from a victim state to a master of our own destiny;

attract the right people, improve our health, and increase our well-being;

provide tools for holistic development—spiritual, psychological, and material.

Does this sound “destructive”?

About the word “demon”: a story of betrayal of meaning

The word “demon” originally comes from the Hindu word “dev”—“heavenly, shining deity.” But over two thousand years, it has been turned upside down, becoming a symbol of evil. Today, in the public consciousness:

Lucifer and Hecate are “dark forces”;

Aphrodite, Odin, Veles, and entire pantheons are “demons” (according to monotheistic texts).

This is not a description of reality—it is an ideological framework designed to supplant polytheism.

There are alternatives!

If precise definition is important to you, choose words that do not carry a negative connotation:

deities;

qliphothic rulers;

goetas;

spiritual beings;

spirits;

gods of Canaan;

daimons (if you really want the Greek tradition).

Why is this strategically important?

If we want to:

legalize the worship of our gods;

gain respect for our tradition;

To show that we are not “saboteurs,” but people seeking depth, wisdom, and strength—

We must stop repeating other people’s propaganda.

Our gods were never considered demons before the advent of monotheism. They were revered as full-fledged deities—powerful, multifaceted, bestowers of life and transformation. That’s exactly what they are today.

A Call to Action

Let’s eradicate this label together. Not out of fear, but out of respect:

for our gods—as majestic forces;

for ourselves—as followers of a profound tradition;

for truth—which transcends other people’s labels.

Let’s call them what they are: deities. Not demons. Not enemies. But allies on the path to strength, wisdom, and freedom.

3 Likes

Gods dont work within the confines of human morality, no god is strictly “good” or “evil”, most are a mix of both at best or more accurately put: A mix of Orderly and Chaotic.

As a qliphoth initiate ive learned that the Demons of the Ars Goetia, and the Demons in the Qliphoth itself are more than willing to do heinous things. Ruthlessly tearing your false assumptions and false identity to shreds, leaving you in tears, chaos and nigh on insanity sometimes - most would say thats an “evil” thing, mostly because they dont see the reasoning behind it or the purpose behind it. The demons dont care whether you go insane from qliphoth initiation, infact im sure alot of them would get fed by it so they’d love it more than anything.

Also, demons existed before monotheism, they arent simply a “label” put on gods by christians or other abrahamic institutions. Demons DO exist, even before abraham was born and are cited in many many myths, legends, and whatever else.

1 Like

That’s true, I have an experience where with one high demon, whose name I won’t mention, I thought that everything they said about him was a lie and that he was actually good and kind, then the demon himself disproved that and basically told me that he didn’t just have a calm, kind nature

And thats the thing. NO ONE has a completely kind and upstanding nature, everyone has both the capacity for both good and evil. Even spirits, gods, demons, whatever else.

Take Lilith for example, there are so many people who want to disprove the “baby killing” part of her yet i know of someone who has asked her to cause an abortion in someone else and she was completely ok with doing so.

You cant just take the comfortable portions of a spirit and discard the dark, because then you arent even working with the spirit, your working with an idea of them that is comfortable to you. Which is the most condescending thing to do.

Infact, Prince Sitri calls himself a demon as i have experienced myself. They dont mean “daemon”, come on now, these spirits are intelligent, they know what a demon is to us. They mean “cacodaemon”, i feel this word has been lost to most practitioners. Demons dont mean they are heavenly divinities when they call themselves a demon, they mean they are wicked spirits.

However, letting u believe they are heavenly divinities is definitely beneficial to them so why would they clarifty? I know i wouldnt lol.

3 Likes

I think he wanted to disprove my false thoughts about him
so he told me the opposite, but it’s true everyone can do both good and bad things

1 Like