Couldn’t agree more with Gnosis and Defectron, it is impossible to give a clear answer on this question.
Now im absolutely not putting you down , i love your question, and it reminds me of another great question i love “where is anti-gravity technology”
Ill explain, It creates an impossible paradox the way you ask the question…is this entity “real” or “imagined”.
The concept of real or imagined are labels that only exist in your head, based on concepts that came from someone elses head before that, someone your probably smarter than honestly… humans have a strange habit of trying to DEFINITIVELY CLASSIFY things that we can only measure the ambient effects of at best, with little to no understanding of the actual causative force(s) that are involved…
Take the “law of gravity”…just calling it a law makes me laugh…the label “gravity” is applied in its most basic form to THE VISIBLE EFFECTS OF GRAVITY…but they don’t really get to the core.
Modern quantum physicists are coming to the same conclusion that anyone who’s not really dumb can tell just from observing nature, gravity is a field effect, and most likely every bit as mutable, manipulable, and as inconsistent across the universe as say, oh , i don’t know…magnetism.
Woooooow…it only took about 300 YEARS to stop being D**ckheads, awesome.
The point is its called a “law”, which when you hear the term is actually an old NLP coinage trick to get your mind to except the data that’s being fed into it without question, it creates an air of “authority”…and it was not done accidentally…think about it, if you start talking about anything like a new technology and you make the mistake of using the words “anti-gravity”,
WHOOP…YOU DONE IT NOW!
"you cant break the “LAW OF GRAVITY”, “ITS IMPOSSIBLE”, and my personal favorite…“IF YOUR SO SMART AND ANTIGRAVITY EXIST…WHY ISN’T ANYONE USING IT?”…
Glad you asked.
First , there’s the small matter of an awesomely clever energy technology oligarchy that’s decades ahead of you in everything from intelligence gathering to the most modern ninja sock changing techniques, running the world on a budget…theirs…lol.
ASIDE from that little doozy…“THE LABEL KILLS THE TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS” , if you build a device which “negates” or “overcomes” the effects of gravity…BY ANY MEANS, then technically it IS anti gravity, it doesn’t have to “create” “anti-gravity” …it just has to create lift and propulsion…because what the f**ck is “gravity”, go ahead point to it, not g forces, or newtons, or pounds…show me the international standard measurement of the GRAVITATIONAL CAUSATIVE FORCE ITSELF, wait? what do you mean it doesn’t exist?.
So what your saying is that it is impossible for me to build an “anti-gravity” machine because it would violate the known postulates and criteria of “the law of gravity” that exist in current mainstream science and that law CLEARLY STATES…uh, what does it state exactly?
Newton’s law of universal gravitation states that any two bodies in the universe attract each other with a force that is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. (Separately it was shown that large spherically symmetrical masses attract and are attracted as if all their mass were concentrated at their centers.) This is a general physical law derived from empirical observations by what Isaac Newton called induction. It is a part of classical mechanics and was formulated in Newton’s work Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica (“the Principia”), first published on 5 July 1687. (When Newton’s book was presented in 1686 to the Royal Society, Robert Hooke made a claim that Newton had obtained the inverse square law from him – see History section below.) In modern language, the law states the following:
Every point mass attracts every single other point mass by a force pointing along the line intersecting both points. The force is proportional to the product of the two masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them:
SO… in other words…STUFF MOVES TOWARDS OTHER STUFF!
Awesome science! thank you for helping me! (sarcasm).
If the device produces lift and propulsion and is able to overcome the net effects of “gravity” or the observed movement of mass towards mass, then how is it NOT anti gravity?..oh right, you cant PROVE its NOT anti gravity and i cant prove it IS , BECAUSE WERE ARGUING ABOUT A USELESS F**king semantic label that makes us both look like we need our noggins implanted with common sense chips.
And the argument is pointless, if old school proponents of gravity would just die already the problem would be solved, lol.
But an easier workaround is that you don’t ever call it what it “is” according to “classical definitions”.
As an example , if you create an antigravity device, DO NOT CALL IT ANTI GRAVITY, even if it is!
fk it, call it a “mass field electron displacement unit” or some sh, the point being that if you build something that people think they know…but create your own labels that better define the enhanced views and understandings of the world view around you, they will be more likely to accept your “new” concepts BECAUSE IT DOESN’T CONFLICT WITH THEIR ESTABLISHED WORLD VIEW OR SOCIETAL PARADIGMS AND NORMS…it fits “outside” into an “other” category, like quantum physics.
Have you ever noticed you can tell someone about the most unbelievable scientific advancements and when they ask “how”?, you just say , “oh its some funky quantum physics thing”.
And then they go “ah…”, that’s it!
Like, “ok now i totally understand as you have placed this thing in the label field of “quantum physics” which is not part of or bound to the normal rules…and produces effects THAT I DON’T HAVE TO UNDERSTAND THE MECHANISM BEHIND IN ORDER FOR THEM TO WORK…data accepted as valid”.
OK, so what is this rant about?
You and i are exactly the same as the people in these scenarios, detectives of the unknown…using dangerously outdated mental mechanisms and guesswork from the 1800’s, lol.
You have to CREATE YOUR OWN LABELS IN YOUR MIND that explain concepts of forces you experience that aren’t currently “given” to you by “modern” grammatical standards…which can be FAR behind the actual experiential data available, especially via the internet.
I suggest actually creating a small book of terms that you can use to refer to things that don’t fit into the current world view…for instance a personal label for beings that are real AND imagined, the problem is demons create OBSERVABLE EFFECTS IN THE MIND…AND EXTERNAL REALITY, like gravity that stretches across different dimensions, and this can be confusing because most things fit into a very “either or” category, it either produces effects of being “REAL” or it produces effects of being “IMAGINED”,
If you think about , most things that are pretty controversial do this, psychedelic drugs for instance, can produce effects that are BOTH real and imagined…thus they are not easy to “classify” in traditional terms…and they are surrounded by controversy.
Also do not think this isn’t important, every member of our human family that expands their paradigm and worldview brings us one step closer to an environment where labels will shift as fluidly and easily as our evolving consciousness…or well cannibalize all our friends and blow each other up…im good either way.
Also im not currently accepting any THEORY as proof, no matter how much science likes to hide behind them, remember, it is the theory of special relativity to this day, think about it.
QUESTION THEORY - it will expand your mind.
Last bit: the official speed of light was arbitrarily changed for years until people got sick of debating all the different measurements, so some dudes just randomly chose one of the estimates and everyone agreed it would be easiest to just STICK WITH THAT…i kid you not, do your homework.
Evoke and meditate often, go overboard, at least a little bit, saturation will REALLY speed up your personal contact with these entities and then you can decide on their “reality” or lack thereof for yourself.
Godspeed new sage